Project facts
Presentation
The Cultural Heritage in the Metropolitan Peripheries (CUMET) project deals with the diverse cultural heritage of the peripheries of three European metropolises, Paris, Madrid, Edinburgh, and its potential to contribute positively to contemporary metropolization. Researchers from three Una Europa universities – Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Complutense University of Madrid, University of Edinburgh – participate in the CUMET project whose objective is to analyze both opportunities and risks for cultural heritage at the metropolitan peripheries. CUMET is interdisciplinary and intersectoral and adopts a comparative methodology.
Heritagization and metropolization
Usually considered as the “city’s backyards”, urban peripheries are crucial for contemporary metropolization. They are the theater of diverse social processes and reconfigurations, which involve formal, functional and symbolic changes that include the formulation of nex uses of public space, the creation of new landmarks, references or heritage symbols. They offer the potential for renewed and more inclusive understanding of often contested and dissonant) cultural heritage. They are, therefore, of increasing interest to national, regional and local governments, private investors and local communities.
Heritage of the metropolitan peripheries includes architectural heritage – industrial areas, factories and warehouses, both obsolete and in use; transport infrastructure including airports, canals and railways; housing, and contemporary residential architecture. It also comprises the rich intangible heritages of working-class and/or migrant communities, in process of constant change and reconfiguration through protest, negotiation, and cultural expression.
However, despite the conceptual broadening of heritage to include more recent heritage elements (19th_20th century) or non-monumental architectural typologies, the heritage of metropolitan peripheries suffers from neglect in comparison to city centers, and their well-recognized cultural zones, monuments, museums, and sights. Peripheral cultural heritage tends to be vulnerable, and ephemeral.
Impacts & Results
The CUMET project addresses two parallel but concurrent phenomena:
I) The importance of cultural heritage located at the metropolitan peripheries to various stakeholders (local authorities, local inhabitants, heritage and cultural institutions, private sector) and for reasons related to local and economic development, tourism, place-making, identity-building for social cohesion.
II) The pressure created by the building of new urban and metropolitan infrastructures (services, industry, housing) on the periphery of European metropolises, resulting in unprecedented densification, extensive renewal of existing urban fabric and the destruction of heritage, often considered as less important than centrally located, monumental heritage.
The conjunction of these trends creates both opportunities for cultural heritage at the metropolitan peripheries (reconversion to cultural, leisure, commercial, tourism functions) and risks (demolition of valuable cultural heritage sites for the needs of public infrastructure necessary to the metropolis, or real estate pressures for new housing in relation to saturated urban centers).